M/S SANJAY CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES,PARATWADA vs. TH PRINCIPAL C.I.T.-1, NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 46/NAG/2016Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur17 November 2022AY 2010-112 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal against the revision order passed by the PCIT under section 263, as they intended to contest the consequential assessment order before the CIT(Appeals). The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of 289 days, which was condoned. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal against a revision order when a consequential assessment order is pending before the appellate authority.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Atal

आदेश / ORDER

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 18-03-2015 passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nagpur (“PCIT”) for assessment year 2010-11.

2.

We find that this appeal was filed with a delay of 289 days. To condone the said delay, the assessee filed notarized affidavit dated 05-01- 2017 explaining the reasons for delay. On perusal of the same, upon hearing both the parties, the delay of 289 days is condoned.

3.

The assessee filed an application dated 11-11-2022 seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal. The relevant extract of the application reads as under : “With all humbleness and if your kindness permit, we do not wish to press this appeal. The present appeal was filed against the revision order passed by the learned PCIT under section 263. Vide 263, order, the learned PCIT set aside the original assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer as per the directions of the PCIT, passed a consequential order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263. Assessee has preferred appeal against the said assessment order which is pending before CIT(Appeals). Assessee will pursue and contest the additions before CIT(Appeals). We humbly wish to submit that we do not wish to press this appeal against revision order u/s. 263. For this act of kindness, assessee shall always remain obliged.”

4.

Shri Kailash G. Kanojiya, the ld. DR reported no objection in case the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal.

5.

In view of the request made by the assessee the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 17th November, 2022.

Sd/- Sd/- (Dr. Dipak P. Ripote) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; दिनाांक / Dated : 17th November, 2022. रदव आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT-1, Nagpur. दवभागीय प्रदतदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, नागपूर, 4. / DR, ITAT, Nagpur. गार्ड फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. //सत्यादपत प्रदत// True Copy// आिेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

वररष्ठ दनजी सदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →