ORNAY FOUNDATION,PANCHKULA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(Exemptions) Chandigarh dated 13.03.2024 pertaining to assessment year 2024-25.

During the courses of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee had moved an application u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act before the ld. CIT (Exemption) on 22.09.2023

Against the said decision of the ld. CIT (Exemptions), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.

The ld. AR has submitted that the CBDT vide Circular No. 7/2024 has extended the time limit for filing Form 10AB upto 30.06.2024 for approval under Section 80G, therefore, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has requested that the matter may be set aside to the file of the ld. CIT (Exemptions) to decide the same afresh.

We have heard the parties and have perused the material on record. We find that the CBDT vide Circular No. 07/2024 dated 25/04/2024 has provided that where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has passed an order rejecting such application, on or before the issuance of the Circular, solely on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date or that the application has been furnished under the wrong section code, it may furnish afresh application in Form No. 10AB within the extended time provided in paragraph 3(H) i.e. 30/06/2024. In the present case, we are of the considered opinion that the application of the assessee deserves to be examined on merits and cannot be dismissed as barred by limitation.

In light of the same, we remit the matter to the file of the ld CIT(E) to admit the application of the assessee as filed within the stipulated period and examine the same on merits as per law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Needless to say, the assessee shall cooperate in the fresh proceedings before the CIT(E).

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.