PLAKSHA UNIVERSITY PUNJAB,CHANDIGARH vs. COMMISSSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 282/CHANDI/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh08 October 2024AY 2024-25Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that CBDT Circular No. 7/2024 extended the time for filing Form 10AB. Therefore, the application should be examined on merits and not dismissed solely on limitation grounds.

What were the facts?

The assessee applied for 80G registration, but the CIT(E) rejected it as the application was filed after six months of commencing activities. The assessee appealed this decision.

What were the issues?

Whether the application for 80G registration was maintainable despite being filed beyond the stipulated time, considering subsequent CBDT circulars.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH

Before: SHRI A.D.JAIN & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Jain, CA
For Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Hearing: 25.09.2024Pronounced: 08.10.2024

आदेश/ORDER

PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(Exemptions) Chandigarh dated 07.03.2024 pertaining to assessment year 2024-25.

2.

During the course of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee had moved an application u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act before the ld.CIT (Exemptions) on 30.09.2023 in Form No. 10AB under Rule 11AA of the I.T.

ITA 282/CHD/2024 A.Y. 2024-25 2 Rules, 1962. A notice was issued by the ld. CIT (Exemptions) on 14.11.2023 through ITBA to specify the date of commencement of activities by the Trust/Society.

In response, the assessee furnished reply vide letter dated 07.12.2023 alongwith its annexures which were considered by the ld. CIT (Exemptions) and it was noticed that the activities commenced on 20.08.2021. Further, the assessee had been granted provisional approval in Form No.10AC on 31.03.2022 under Clause (iv) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G for the period commencing from 31.03.2022 to A.Y. 2024-25. The ld. CIT (Exemptions) noted that the date of commencement of its activities is 20.08.2021 and the date of filing of application in Form No.10AB is 30.09.2023, which is after expiry of six months of commencement of its activity.

Therefore, the ld. CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application of the assessee holding it as non-maintainable without going into the merits of the application.

3.

Against the said decision of the ld. CIT (Exemptions), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.

ITA 282/CHD/2024 A.Y. 2024-25 3 4. The ld. AR has submitted that the CBDT vide Circular No. 7/2024 has extended the time limit for filing Form 10AB upto 30.06.2024 for approval under Section 80G, therefore, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has requested that the matter may be set aside to the file of the ld. CIT (Exemptions) to decide the same afresh.

5.

The ld. DR has not raised any objection to the request of the assessee.

6.

We have heard the parties and have perused the material on record. We find that the CBDT vide Circular No. 07/2024 dated 25/04/2024 has provided that where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has passed an order rejecting such application, on or before the issuance of the Circular, solely on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date or that the application has been furnished under the wrong section code, it may furnish afresh application in Form No. 10AB within the extended time provided in paragraph 3(H) i.e. 30/06/2024. In the present case, we are of the considered opinion that the application of the assessee deserves to be examined on merits and cannot be dismissed as barred by limitation.

ITA 282/CHD/2024 A.Y. 2024-25 4

7.

In light of the same, we remit the matter to the file of the ld CIT(E) to admit the application of the assessee as filed within the stipulated period and examine the same on merits as per law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Needless to say, the assessee shall cooperate in the fresh proceedings before the CIT(E).

8.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 08.10.2024.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →