SANTOSH,KURUKSHETRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, KURUKSHETRA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 200/CHANDI/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 October 2024AY 2012-12Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that merely uploading information on the Income Tax Portal does not constitute effective service of notice. The assessee deserves an opportunity to present their case, rendering the Assessing Officer's order unsustainable.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal against the assessment order was confirmed by the CIT(A) without providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee contended that the notice of hearing was not effectively served, only uploaded on the Income Tax Portal.

What were the issues?

Whether the Income Tax Portal upload constitutes effective service of notice and if the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144,Section 282

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

आदेश/Order

PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi [in short ‘ld. CIT(A)’] dated 01.01.2024 pertaining to 2012-13 assessment year.

2.

The assessee in this appeal has contested the action of the Assessing Officer in passing the order under Section 147 r.w.s. 144 and also the action of the ld.CIT(A) in confirming the action of the AO while passing the order under Section A.Y. 2012-13 2 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

3.

At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to order of the Assessing Officer confirmed by the ld. CIT(A), to submit that the same is an ex-parte order. He has submitted that the Assessing Officer has summarily rejected the application of the assessee without giving any opportunity of hearing to the assessee to present its case. He has submitted that no notice of date of hearing was served by the Assessing Officer, either through physical mode or through e-mail etc. That the notice of date of hearing was allegedly uploaded on Income Tax Portal and the assessee was not aware of uploading of any such notice regarding date of hearing. That no service of notice was ever affected on the assessee.

4.

The ld. DR could not rebut the aforesaid factual position.

5.

We have heard the rival contentions. Merely uploading of information about the date of hearing on the Income Tax Portal is not an effective service of notice as per the provisions of Section 282 of the Income Tax Act. In the facts A.Y. 2012-13 3 and circumstances of the present case, we are of the considered opinion that the assessee deserves to be given appropriate opportunity to present her case. Therefore, the order of the Assessing Officer is not sustainable in the eyes of law. The same is hereby set aside with a direction to the Assessing Officer to decide the appeal of the assessee afresh after giving proper and adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case. The Assessing Officer will serve notice of hearing through physical mode as well as through electronic mode upon the assessee.

6.

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 14th October,2024.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →