GEETA SHARMA,SUNAM vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , PATIALA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 476/CHANDI/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 October 2024AY 2019-20Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)17 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the original assessment order contained incorrect figures and facts due to copy-paste errors, and the PCIT failed to consider the assessee's submissions regarding these errors. The Tribunal also noted the Income Tax Department's failure to rectify the original assessment order within the stipulated time.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return of income, and the case was selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment ex-parte due to non-compliance with notices. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) revised the order under Section 263, but the assessee contended that the original assessment order contained significant errors and copy-pasted information from another case.

What were the issues?

Whether the PCIT's revisionary order under Section 263 was justified when the original assessment order suffered from significant factual errors and copy-paste mistakes, and whether the department's failure to rectify these errors impacted the validity of the revision.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 144,Section 263,Section 154,Section 10(37),Section 272A(1)(d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH

Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI,

Hearing: 19.09.2024Pronounced: 29/10/2024
24.

Appeal of assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced as on 29.10.2024.

More judgments on Section 142(1)

All 17,244 judgments and leading authorities on Section 142(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →