SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-22(2), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal dismissed the transfer pricing grounds as withdrawn. The disallowance of expatriate salaries was deleted, following a co-ordinate bench decision. The Section 80G deduction issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought to withdraw transfer pricing grounds due to an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) being signed. The remaining grounds concerned disallowance of expatriate salaries and Section 80G deductions.
What were the issues?
Whether transfer pricing grounds can be withdrawn due to APA signing, and the allowability of expatriate salary disallowance and Section 80G deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 80G,Section 192
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheil India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT6 citing169 Taxmann.com 507 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘I’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRAM PRASAD, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
-
Both the above appeals by the assessee are directed against the order dated 29.10.2024 u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) r.w.s 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] for AY 2021-22 and order dated
ITA No. 5256 & 3724/DEL/2024 [A.Ys 2020-21 & 2021-22] Samsung India Electronics 31.07.2024 u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) r.w.s 144B of the Income-tax Act,
1961 for A.Ys 2020-21. ITA No. 3724/DEL/2024 A.Y 2020-21
Ground No. 1 is general.
At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026