SMT. BIMLA PUNIA ,JAGADHRI vs. THE ITO, WARD -1, YAMUNANAGAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 524/CHANDI/2022Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 December 2024AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The assessee can revive the appeal if the scheme benefits are not availed due to technicalities.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)/NFAC order for AY 2015-16. The assessee had applied under the 'Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas, 2024' scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to availing the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 254(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी िव"म िसंह यादव, लेखा सद" एवं "ी परेश म. जोशी, "ाियक सद" BEFORE: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM & SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI, JM आयकर अपील सं./ िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Smt. Bimla Punia बनाम The ITO C/o Shri Tejmohan Singh, Advocate Ward-1, Yamuna Nagar # 527, Sector 10D, Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: BGAPP2662L अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 30/12/2024 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 30/12/2024 आदेश/Order

PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM

1.

The present appeal is directed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 29/04/2022 passed for A.Y. 2015-16.

2.

During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that since the assessee has moved an application under “The Direct Tax ‘Vivad Se Vishwas, 2024” Scheme and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form No. 2 dt. 14.12.2024, in response to the application filed by the assessee, therefore, the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn. 3. The Ld. DR, on the other hand, was unable to controvert the facts submitted by the Assessee and didn’t object to application seeking withdrawal of the subject appeal. 4. In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is observed that in case Assessee fails to avail the benefit of this scheme due to any technicalities, then Assessee will be at liberty to get this appeal revived by filing a Misc. Application. This application should be filed within limitation period provided u/s 254(2) of the Act. 5. In light of aforesaid, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →