M/S DHAULADHAR EDUCATION SOCIETY,KANGRA vs. ITO (TDS), PALAMPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 201/CHANDI/2018Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 May 2018AY 2013-141 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should not have dismissed the appeals of the assessee. The assessee had made valid pleas regarding the exemption of interest payments.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to file submissions before the Assessing Officer, resulting in an ex-parte order. The assessee later argued that interest payments to Kotak Mahindra Bank were exempt under Section 194A(3)(i)(a) and that Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd had accounted for the interest received.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeals without considering the assessee's submissions regarding exemptions and payee's income reporting.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 194A,Section 139,Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITA Nos. 201 to 204/Chd/2018- Dhauladhar Educational Society, Distt.Kangra 2

3.

Before the Assessing officer, neither the assessee nor its

representative filed any submissions and the Assessing officer passed

an ex-parte order declaring the assessee as ‘assessee in default’.

However, in appeal before the CIT(A), the assessee submitted that so

far as the interest payments made to M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank was

concerned, the same were exempt from the purview of section 194A

of the Act being falling under the exemption clause of section 194A(3)(i)(a) of the Act as the Kotak Mahindra Bank was a banking

company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 applies. The

second submission of the assessee has been that so far as the interest

payment made to Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd was

concerned, that the said company in its return of income had taken

into account the interest received from the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A),

however, dismissed the appeals of the assessee on merits vide order

dated 26.7.2017 on the ground that the assessee had not furnished the

return of income of the payee u/s 139 of the Act.

4.

Being aggrieved, the assessee filed M.A. u/s 154 of the Act

and sought to furnish the PAN Number and status of one of the

payee Kotak Mahindra Bank being a banking Financial Company.

The Ld. CIT(A), however, dismissed the application filed u/s 154 of

the Act holding that the assessee had not furnished the above details

during the appellate proceedings.

5.

After considering the rival contentions of the parties, we are of

the view, that the Ld. CIT(A) should not have dismissed the appeals

of the assessee. That the assessee had already pleaded that the

More judgments on Section 194A

All 1,500 judgments and leading authorities on Section 194A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →