GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD.,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as the issue had been decided in their favor. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order. The assessee later received an order giving effect to the revision, which decided the matter in their favor.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee is maintainable when the underlying issue has been resolved in their favor through a subsequent order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH
Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar
Gujarat Industrial The Pr.CIT-3, Investment Corporation Ahmedabad Limited. Vs sixth Floor 11 And 12 (Respondent) Udyog Bhavan, Gh Road Gh-IV Circle, Gandhinagar, Gujarat382011 PAN: AAACG5304Q (Appellant) Assessee Represented: None (Application for withdrawal of appeal) Revenue Represented: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 31-01-2024 Date of pronouncement : 31-01-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee as against the Revision order dated 29.03.2021 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Ahmedabad as against the assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2016-17.
Page No 2 Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. vs. Pr. CIT
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee vide its letter dated 25.08.2023 stated that the assessee received giving effect order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 263 dated 28.03.2022 deciding the matter in favour of the assessee. Therefore the assessee is hereby withdraw the appeal.
Recording the above letter, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026