RAMLALA CHARITABLE TRUST,VALSAD vs. COMMISSION OF INCOME (EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Exemption)'s order, noting that the assessee's counsel could not controvert the findings regarding excessive religious expenses. Therefore, the trust was not eligible for registration under Section 80G(5).
What were the facts?
The assessee, Ramlala Charitable Trust, applied for registration under Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application because the trust's religious expenses exceeded 5% of its total receipts.
What were the issues?
Whether the trust is eligible for registration under Section 80G(5) when its religious expenses exceed the prescribed limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: MRS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA & MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE
O R D E R आदेश आदेश PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exception), Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as “ld. CIT(Exemption)”] dated 18.04.2019 denying grant of registration under Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) . 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
“1. That on facts, and in law, the learned CIT(E), Ahmedabad has grievously erred in rejecting the approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case of your appellant, the relief claimed in Ground No.1 is allowed.”
A perusal of the order of the ld. CIT (Exemption) reveals that the assessee’s application for registration of the trust u/s 80G(5) of the Act was Ramlala Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(Exemption) AY : 2018-19 rejected noting the fact from the audited accounts of the assessee-trust for Financial Years (FYs) 2015-16 to 2017-18 that religious expenses incurred were more than 5% of its total receipts, being to the tune of approximately 60% in the three years. The ld. CIT(Exemption), therefore, held that as per the provisions of Section 80G(5)(b) of the Act, the trust was not eligible for registration/approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act. The ld. Counsel for the assessee, during the course of hearing before us, was unable to controvert the findings of the ld. CIT(Exemption), both on facts and on law. In view of the above, we see no reason to interfere in the order of the ld. CIT(Exemption) denying grant of approval to the assessee-trust u/s 80G(5) of the Act. The appeal of the assessee is accordingly dismissed.
In effect, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 21/02/2024 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- V3 Enterprises PVT LTD vs. The State Of ApAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- Zenith Metaplast(P) Limited vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- M/S Karo Sambhav Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Pranshu Singhal vs. Additional/Joint Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 31 Oct 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026