NEETU YADAV,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest received under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is part of enhanced compensation and not taxable as income from other sources, following Supreme Court decisions. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue's argument regarding the land's distance from urban areas for capital gains purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee received interest on enhanced compensation for acquired land. The Revenue treated this interest as taxable income from other sources, while the assessee argued it was part of enhanced compensation and exempt under Section 10(37). Another issue involved the classification of land as a capital asset for long-term capital gains.
What were the issues?
Whether interest on enhanced compensation is taxable as income from other sources or exempt as part of enhanced compensation. Whether the land sold qualifies as a capital asset for long-term capital gains.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 56(2)(viii),Section 10(37),Section 2(14)(iii)(b),Section 28
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(14)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT2,943 citing243 ITR 83 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd.897 citing332 ITR 167 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Ghanshyam (HUF)363 citing181 Taxmann 368 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- Rama Bai v. CIT258 citing181 ITR 400 · 1990 · SC
- CIT v. Govindbhai Mamaiya205 citing91 Taxmann.com 20 · 2018 · SC
- V.M.Salgaocar & Bros.(P) Ltd. v. CIT189 citing243 ITR 383 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sohana Woollen Mills180 citing296 ITR 238 · 2008 · HC
- Mahender Pal Narang v. CBDT178 citing161 Taxmann.com 301 · 2024 · HC
- CIT v. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages P Ltd.152 citing331 ITR 192 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Ganpat Ram Bisnoi145 citing296 ITR 292 · 2008 · HC
- Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai v. ITO TDS128 citing388 ITR 343 · 2016 · HC
- 4th March, 2021 in Mahender Pal Narang v. CBDT84 citing279 Taxmann 74 · 2021 · SC
- Shri Manjeet Singh HUF v. UOI & Others in CWP No. 15506 of 2013; Shri Puneet Singh vs. CIT83 citing110 Taxmann.com 116 · 2019
- Pawan Kumar v. PCIT55 citing159 Taxmann.com 61 · 2024 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
These assessee’s three appeals in ITA Nos. 4095 & 4229/Del/2024 and ITA No. 845/Del/2025 for Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2019-20, arise against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1066728710(1) & 1067097100(1) & 1066774096(1) dated 15.07.2024, 16.07.2024 & 29.07.2024 in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), respectively.
Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused.
Coming to the assessee’s twin appeals ITA No. 845/Del/2025 and ITA No. 4
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 56(2)(viii)
- Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Dudhagara, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 738/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon, Haryana vs PCIT, JaipurITA 209/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sudhakar Purushottam Bhalerao, Osmanabad vs ITO Ward 1, LaturITA 2882/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Randhir Singh, Yamunanagar vs ITO, YamunanagarITA 661/CHANDI/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Rakesh, Gurgaon vs Income Tax Officer, GurugramITA 5707/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026