ACIT, C-5(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S YGC PROJECTS LTD., CHANDIGARH
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, departmental appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 10 lacs are not maintainable. The Departmental DR stated they would not press the appeal.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Department against an order of the CIT(A) for assessment year 2014-15. The tax effect in the departmental appeal was admittedly less than Rs. 10 lacs.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the departmental appeal was maintainable given the low tax effect, in light of the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH ‘B’, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & MS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH ‘B’, CHANDIGARH
BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.434/Chd/2018 (Assessment Year : 2014-15) The A.C.I.T., Vs. M/s YGC Projects Limited, Circle 5(1), Koooothi No.39, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh. Chandigarh. PAN: AAACY2847C (Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : Shri Manjit Singh, Sr.DR Respondent by : Shri Nikhil Goyal, CA Date of hearing : 10.07.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 10.07.2018
ORDER PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, A.M. : This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against
the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2,
Chandigarh dated 10.1.2018 relating to assessment year
2014-15.
It is stated that in the present appeal the tax effect is
less than the prescribed limit provided by the recent CBDT
Circular.
According to Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015,
the CBDT in supercession of earlier instructions has
directed that department’s appeals before ITAT shall not be
filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the
monetary limit of Rs.10 lacs. The tax will not include any
interest thereon. It is further clarified that if in the case of
an assessee, disputed issues arise in more than one
assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such
assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect
of disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit so specified.
This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending
appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth before the
Tribunal. The pending appeals below the specified tax limit
may be withdrawn/not pressed.
Admittedly, in the departmental appeal, the tax effect
is less than Rs.10 lacs, therefore, departmental appeal is
not maintainable. The learned CIT (Appeals) decided the
issue in departmental appeal on facts and the case of the
revenue would not fall in the exceptions provided in the
above circular.
In view of the above, learned D.R. stated that since
departmental appeal is filed against the CBDT instructions,
therefore, he would not be pressing departmental appeal.
Therefore, the above departmental appeal is dismissed being
not pressed.
In the result, the Departmental appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court.
Sd/- Sd/- (SANJAY GARG) (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 10th July, 2018 *Rati* Copy to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A) 4. The CIT 5. The DR
Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026