M-STAR HOTELS PVT. LTD,KOCHI vs. THE ITO CORP.WARD-1(3), KOCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) disposed of the appeals without giving a fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The CIT(A) should have decided the case on merits rather than dismissing it for non-compliance.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the CIT(A) for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Despite multiple notices, the assessee failed to provide submissions. Consequently, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeals ex-parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeals ex-parte without providing a fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH: COCHIN
Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K.
PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals by the assessee are directed against different orders of Ld. CIT(A) dated 15.11.2021 for the assessment years 2012- 13, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The assessee has raised various grounds, which are common in nature. Hence, these are clubbed together and disposed by this common order for the sake of convenience. The main ground in this appeal is that Ld. CIT(A) disposed of the appeal of the assessee without giving fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Facts of the case are that the assessee has filed appeal before Ld. CIT(A) consequent to which notice was issued on 6.1.2021 seeking the assessee to file written submission electronically before 21.1.2021. However, no response from the assessee was received. However, one more notice was issued seeking the assessee to file submissions vide notice dated 16.9.2021 to file the submissions before 1.10.2021. But no response received from the assessee. Finally, one more notice was issued on 6.10.2021 to file the submissions before 21.10.2021. Inspite of that, no response was received from the assessee. Consequent to this, Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal confirming the order of the AO as there was no details furnished by assessee rebutting the findings of the AO. Against this, assessee is in appeal before us stating that an opportunity may be given to the assessee to put its case before NFAC. As seen from the records, CIT(A), NFAC disposed of the appeals of the assessee ex- parte without giving fair opportunity of hearing. In our opinion, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have been decided the case on merit instead of TO 15/Coch/2022 M/s. M-Star Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Kochi
Page 3 of 3 stating that the assessee has not filed anything in support of the claim of the assessee. In view of this, in the interest of justice, we remit the issue to the file of Ld. CIT(A), NFAC to decide it afresh after giving opportunity of presentation of case by the assessee in accordance with law. At this stage, we refrain from going into the other grounds raised by the assessee, which are kept open.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 4th Aug, 2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026