M-STAR HOTELS PVT. LTD,KOCHI vs. THE ITO CORP.WARD-1(3), KOCHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 15/COCH/2022Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 August 2022AY 2015-163 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) disposed of the appeals without giving a fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The CIT(A) should have decided the case on merits rather than dismissing it for non-compliance.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the CIT(A) for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Despite multiple notices, the assessee failed to provide submissions. Consequently, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeals ex-parte.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeals ex-parte without providing a fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH: COCHIN

Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K.

For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 04.08.2022Pronounced: 04.08.2022

PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

These appeals by the assessee are directed against different orders of Ld. CIT(A) dated 15.11.2021 for the assessment years 2012- 13, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The assessee has raised various grounds, which are common in nature. Hence, these are clubbed together and disposed by this common order for the sake of convenience. The main ground in this appeal is that Ld. CIT(A) disposed of the appeal of the assessee without giving fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

2.

Facts of the case are that the assessee has filed appeal before Ld. CIT(A) consequent to which notice was issued on 6.1.2021 seeking the assessee to file written submission electronically before 21.1.2021. However, no response from the assessee was received. However, one more notice was issued seeking the assessee to file submissions vide notice dated 16.9.2021 to file the submissions before 1.10.2021. But no response received from the assessee. Finally, one more notice was issued on 6.10.2021 to file the submissions before 21.10.2021. Inspite of that, no response was received from the assessee. Consequent to this, Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal confirming the order of the AO as there was no details furnished by assessee rebutting the findings of the AO. Against this, assessee is in appeal before us stating that an opportunity may be given to the assessee to put its case before NFAC. As seen from the records, CIT(A), NFAC disposed of the appeals of the assessee ex- parte without giving fair opportunity of hearing. In our opinion, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have been decided the case on merit instead of TO 15/Coch/2022 M/s. M-Star Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Kochi

Page 3 of 3 stating that the assessee has not filed anything in support of the claim of the assessee. In view of this, in the interest of justice, we remit the issue to the file of Ld. CIT(A), NFAC to decide it afresh after giving opportunity of presentation of case by the assessee in accordance with law. At this stage, we refrain from going into the other grounds raised by the assessee, which are kept open.

3.

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 4th Aug, 2022

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →