ITO 3(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. APPLICOMP (INDIA) LTD, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 8432/MUM/2010Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 January 2016AY 2006-075 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which prescribes a monetary limit of Rs. 10 lakhs for filing appeals before the Tribunal, is binding on the revenue authorities. Therefore, the appeals filed by the revenue were not maintainable.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT against orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10. The tax effect involved in these appeals was less than Rs. 10 lakhs.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the maintainability of departmental appeals before the ITAT when the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by a CBDT circular.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 115JB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra Karkhanis
Hearing: 14.01.2016Pronounced: 22.01.2016

Heard together (4 matters)

I.T.A. No.8432/Mum/2010
I.T.A. 8436/Mum/2010
I.T.A 3155/Mum/2012
I.T.A.3653/Mum/2012

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Assessee by: Shri Bhupendra Karkhanis Department by: Shri K.B.Shukla सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 14.01.2016 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 22.01.2016 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, JM: All these appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the separate orders passed by learned CIT(A) in their respective hands. ,8436/M/10, 3155/M/12&3653/M/2014 A.Y. 2006-07,2007-08,2008-09 & 2009-10

2. At the time of hearing, it was noticed that the tax effect involved in these appeals on the disputed issues is less than Rs.10 lakhs. For the sake of convenience, we tabulate below the relevant details:-

S.No. Name of assessee Amount in Penalty deleted or dispute(for reduced by Ld quantum appeal) CIT(A) In Rs. in Rs. 1 Applicomp (India) Ltd. 49,56,520/-* -- (For A.Y.2006-07) *Addition made to book profit u/s 115JB 2 Applicomp (India) Ltd. 26,66,845/-* -- (For A.Y.2007-08) *Addition made to book profit u/s 115JB 3 Applicomp (India) Ltd. 32,87,835/-* -- (For A.Y.2008-09) *Addition made to book profit u/s 115JB 4 Applicomp (India) Ltd. 31,29,232/-* -- (For A.Y.2009-10) *Addition made to book profit u/s 115JB

3. We notice that the revenue is contesting the decision of Ld CIT(A) in granting relief to the extent stated above and hence the tax effect involved on the above said disputed amounts works out to less than Rs.10 lakhs. Recently the CBDT has issued a circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 prescribing new monetary limits for preferring appeals against the orders passed by Ld CIT(A) before the Tribunal. The relevant portion of the circular cited above reads as under:

“F No 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt)

,8436/M/10, 3155/M/12&3653/M/2014 A.Y. 2006-07,2007-08,2008-09 & 2009-10 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board Direct Taxes Circular No. 21/2015 New Delhi the 10th December, 2015 Sub :Revision of monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before Supreme Court - measures for reducing litigation – Reg Reference is invited to Board's instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014 wherein monetary limits and other conditions for filing departmental appeals (in Income-tax matters) before Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before the Supreme Court were specified.

2.

In supersession of the above instruction, it has been decided by the Board that departmental appeals may be filed on merits before Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before the Supreme Court keeping in view the monetary limits and conditions specified below.

3.

Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder: S No Appeals in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.

4. For this purpose, "tax effect" means the difference between the tax on the total income assessed and the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issues against which appeal is intended to be filed (hereinafter referred to as "disputed issues"). However the tax will not include any interest thereon, except where chargeability of interest itself is in dispute. In case the chargeability of interest is the issue under dispute, the amount of interest shall be the tax effect. In cases where returned loss is reduced or assessed as income, the tax effect would ,8436/M/10, 3155/M/12&3653/M/2014 A.Y. 2006-07,2007-08,2008-09 & 2009-10

include notional tax on disputed additions. In case of penalty orders, the tax effect will mean quantum of penalty deleted or reduced in the order to be appealed against.

5.

………. 6……… 7. …… 8. ……. 9. …..

10.

This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.” 11. …..” It can be noticed that the CBDT has further clarified that this new circular/instruction shall apply retrospectively, i.e., even to the pending appeals. It is also stated that the quantum of penalty deleted or reduced shall be considered for determining the monetary limits.

4.

It is well settled proposition that the circulars issued by the CBDT are binding on the Income Tax Authorities. For this proposition, one may gainfully refer to the decisions rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan (2003)(177 Taxation 775) and Pradip J Mehta Vs. CIT (2008)(300 ITR 231). Hence, the latest circular issued by the CBDT (referred supra) is binding on the income tax authorities. Accordingly, we find ,8436/M/10, 3155/M/12&3653/M/2014 A.Y. 2006-07,2007-08,2008-09 & 2009-10 merit in the submissions of Ld A.R that these appeals of the revenue are not maintainable, since tax effect involved in these appeals are less than Rs.10 lakhs. Accordingly, we dismiss all the appeals filed by the revenue.

More judgments on Section 115JB

All 5,494 judgments and leading authorities on Section 115JB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →