DCIT, CIR-10(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S CHAMPION COMMERCIAL CO. LTD., KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1380/KOL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 March 2016AY 2009-20102 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal of the revenue deserved to be dismissed in terms of low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015. The circular was binding on tax authorities and applied retrospectively to pending appeals.

What were the facts?

The revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The disputed addition before the tribunal was Rs. 27,94,299/-, with a tax effect of Rs. 9,49,782/-, which was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 21/2015.

What were the issues?

Whether the revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect based on a binding CBDT circular. The applicability of the CBDT circular to pending appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri Mahavir Singh, JM & Shri M. Balaganesh, AM]

Hearing: 03.03.2016Pronounced: 03.03.2016

ORDER

Per Shri Mahavir Singh, JM:

1.

This appeal by revenue is arising out of order of CIT(A)-4, Kolkata vide Appeal No. 1768/CIT(A)-4/Circle-10(1)/Kol/14-15 dated 21.08.2015. Assessment was framed by DACIT, circle- 10(1), Kolkata u/s. 147/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2009-10 vide his order dated 05.01.2015.

2.

At the outset, it is seen that the quantum involved in this case is Rs.27,94,299/-and tax effect on the disputed addition before us is Rs.9,49,782/-, which is less than Rs. 10 lacs. 3. After perusing the materials available on record, we find that the additions disputed before us is below the tax effect limit prescribed by CBDT vide Circular No. 21 / 2015 dated 10.12.2015 for preferring appeals before tribunal by the revenue. On perusal of the Circular No. 21 / 2015 dated 10.12.2015 and the materials available on record, Ld. DR could not point out whether this case falls under any of the exception as provided in the circular despite specific opportunity was given, does not fall under any of the exceptions contemplated in the said Circular, as this is covered. We also find that the Circular makes it very clear that the revised monetary limits shall apply retrospectively to pending appeals also. We find that the Circular is binding on the tax authorities. This position has been confirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd reported in 267 ITR 272 (SC). Hence, we hold that the appeal of the revenue deserves to be dismissed in terms of low tax effect vide Circular No.21 / 2015 dated 10.12.2015. Accordingly, this being a low tax effect case, we dismiss this appeal of revenue in limine, as unadmitted, without going into the merits of the case. 4. In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (M. Balaganesh) (Mahavir Singh) Accountant Member

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →