A.C.I.T CIR - 43,KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S TIRUPATI PROJECTS, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit of Rs. 10,00,000/- for filing appeals by the Revenue. Following CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue preferred an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed by the CIT(Appeals). The tax effect involved in the appeal was below the revised monetary limit fixed by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to the tax effect being below the CBDT's revised monetary limit for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘C’, KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M.Jagtap, AM & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, JM]
ORDER
Per Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, JM
This appeal preferred by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 24.12.2012 passed by the CIT(Appeals)-XXX, Kolkata in Appeal No.539/CIT(A)-XXX/Cir-43/2009-10 for the assessment year 2007-08 framed under section 143(3) of the I.T.Act.
As pointed out by the ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, the tax effect involved in these appeal of the Revenue is less than the revised monetary limit recently fixed by the CBDT vide Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December,2015 at Rs.10,00,000/- for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal and this position clearly evident from the grounds raised by the Revenue in this appeal is not disputed even by the ld. D.R.
2 M/s. Tirupati Projects In Circular No. 21/2015 (supra) recently issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit for filing the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been increased to Rs.10,00,000/- and as clarified in the said Circular, the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs.10,00,000/- may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Keeping in view the instruction given by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, which is squarely applicable in the present case, the appeal filed by the Revenue in this case is treated as withdrawn/not pressed and dismissed accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the department is dismissed.
Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 07.03.2016
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026