ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. FUSSY FINANCIAL SERVICES (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

The ground raised in these appeals by the Revenue is against the deletion of additions of `16,52,750/- and `20,02,420/-. Thus, apparently, the tax effect is below `10 lakhs. The CBDT in its Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 has revised the monetary limit for filing of the departmental appeals to the ITAT at `10 lakhs which is evident from paragraph 3 of the Circular, which reads as under:-

“3. Henceforth, appeal/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:-

In paragraph 10 of the Circular, such monetary limits have been made applicable retrospectively. For ready reference, we reproduce paragraph 10 below:-

Therefore, the above Circular would be squarely applicable to the appeals under consideration before us.

Learned CIT-DR Shri Ravi Jain who appeared at the time of hearing before us stated that he needs some time to call for the report from the Assessing Officer as well as instructions from Administrative CIT for withdrawing these appeals because the appeals were filed with the approval of Administrative CIT. Learned CIT-DR further pointed out that in paragraph 7 of the said Circular, it has been clarified by the CBDT that withdrawal of these appeals by the Revenue on account of 3 ITA-2080 & 3145/Del/2014 low tax effect should not be considered as a precedent in the subsequent years of the acceptance of issues involved in these appeals and, therefore, if in the subsequent year similar issue arises before the ITAT where the appeal is above the tax limit as prescribed in this Circular, the same should be decided on merits.

Learned counsel for the assessee, on the other hand, stated that the Circular is squarely applicable to the facts of the assessee’s case.

After considering the submissions of both the sides, we are of the opinion that there is no necessity for adjourning the appeals and calling the report from the Assessing Officer because, apparently, the tax effect involved in these appeals of the Revenue is below `10 lakhs. However, we add here that if on receipt of order the Assessing Officer finds that the tax effect is above `10 lakhs or, in any other manner, the Circular is not applicable, he will be at liberty to file the miscellaneous application. We also agree with the contention of the learned CIT-DR that this order would not be considered as an acceptance by the Revenue on the issue involved in these appeals and will not be an estoppel for the Revenue to take up the issue involved in these appeals before the ITAT on merits if the tax effect in those years is more than `10 lakhs. With this remark, we deem it proper to dismiss the appeals in the light of the Circular No.21/2015 of CBDT dated 10th December, 2015.