SRI ANIL BHATTACHARYA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-39, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal, following established precedents for non-prosecution, decided to dismiss the appeal. This decision was made due to the assessee's consistent failure to appear or pursue their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). On multiple hearing dates, neither the assessee nor their representative appeared, and no adjournment was sought. The tribunal noted the absence of the appellant.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's failure to prosecute their appeal, leading to the dismissal for non-appearance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), IV, Kolkata in appeal no. 52/CIT(A)- IV/Kol/Cir.-39/2012-13 dated 29-01-2014 for the assessment year 2010-11.
On various dates of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment petition was filed. It assumes that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting his case. In view of the above, following the decisions of the ITAT, Delhi Bench in the case of Multiplan India (P) Limited reported in 38 ITD 320(Del) and Hon’ble M.P High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar Vs. CWT reported in (223 ITR 480(MP), we dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine for non prosecution.
In the result the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 28-04-2016
Sd/- Sd/- ( P.M. Jagtap, Accountant Member ) (S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member)
Date 28-04-2016
Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. The Appellant/assessee: Shri Anil Bhattacharya 7/1B Grant Lane, Lal Bazar, Kol-12. 2 The Respondent- Shri Pankaj Dewivedi, ACIT, Cir-39, Kolkata 3 /The CIT, 4.The CIT(A)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026