DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SUNIL AGARWAL, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular dated 10.12.2015, which sets a monetary limit for filing appeals, is binding on the Department. As the tax effect was below the prescribed limit, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Department appealed an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2006-07. The assessee pointed out that the tax effect was below Rs. 10 lakhs, a threshold below which the CBDT circular mandates not filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the Department's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N.K.SAINI & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO
O R D E R
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM
This is an appeal filed by the Department is directed against the order dated 30.04.2009 of ld. CIT(A)-XIX, New Delhi for the Assessment Year 2006-07.
At the outset of the hearing itself, the ld. AR brought to our attention that CBDT vide Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 has decided that the revenue would not prefer an appeal before the Tribunal if the tax effect is less than Rs.10 lakhs. He has also filed the computation to show that the tax effect in this case is below Rs.10 lakhs. Therefore, he pleaded that the appeal of the revenue be dismissed as per the instruction of the CBDT and also submitted that the cross objection preferred by the assessee is not pressed. 3. Ld. DR was fair enough to admit the aforesaid factual position. 4. We have heard both the sides on the issue and perused the material. We find that the CBDT vide circular dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hon’ble High Courts and Hon’ble Supreme Court. The relevant para of the aforesaid circular is reproduced as under :- “3. Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder :-
Page No. 2 Sl.No. Appeals in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit(in Rs.) 1. Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000 2. Before High Court 20,00,000 3. Before Supreme Court 25,00,000
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026