M/S ANDRITZ HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), BHOPAL

ITA 75/IND/2022Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 August 2023AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Judicial Member), SHRI B.M. BIYANI (Accountant Member)27 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that while aggregation of closely linked transactions is permissible, the assessee's aggregation of transactions with multiple AEs across different jurisdictions was beyond the scope. The DRP's decision was also found to be lacking detailed reasoning.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a subsidiary of an Austrian company, reported international transactions. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) disagreed with the assessee's aggregation of transactions and its benchmarking, proposing adjustments for revenue from projects and technical services.

What were the issues?

Whether international transactions can be aggregated for transfer pricing analysis, and whether the DRP provided a reasoned order on the adjustments proposed by the TPO.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 92C,Section 92D

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

For Appellant: Shri Rahul, Kaul AR
For Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Hearing: 13.06.2023Pronounced: 28.08.2023

Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM:

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the assessment order dated 22.02.2022 passed u/s 143(3) r.w. section 144C(13) of the Act in pursuant to the directions of DRP dated 25.01.2022 passed u/s 144C(5) of the Act for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The assesse is subsidiary of Andritz Hydro Private Limited GmbH Austria and engaged in the business of design, manufacture, servicing, erection and installation of hydro and thermal power generators. It is stated that Andritz Group is a global supplier of turnkey electromechanical equipement and services for hydropower plants. The assesse filed its return of income for the year under consideration on Andritz Hydro P

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 92C

All 1,769 judgments and leading authorities on Section 92C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →