SHABAD LOK TRUST,SURENDRANAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, citing the assessee's lack of familiarity with income tax procedures and the IT portal. It held that the ex-parte orders were passed without sufficient opportunity and remanded the matters back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Public Charitable Trust, applied for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the applications and cancelled provisional registration due to non-compliance with notices and procedural delays, passing ex-parte orders.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the applications for registration and approval without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee, and whether the delays in filing appeals and applications were justifiable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB,Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi),Section 80G
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These two appeals are filed by the applicant Trust against two different orders dated 19.02.2024 & 01.03.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad.
Firstly we are taking up, the appeal being against the order u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed by the CIT(Exemption). The applicant is a Public Charitable Trust filed application for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 30.09.2023. The provisional registration was approved on 02.12.2022 and granted provisional registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) and thus, provisionally it was approved from A.Y. 2023-24. The CIT(E) called upon the applicant for certain details/documents vide notices dated 23.11.2023 and 05.01.2024 especially the audited accounts for F.Y. 2023-24. The Applicant did not respond the said notices and therefore, the CIT(Exemption) rejected the application filed in Form No. 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and cancelled the provisional registration vide order dated 19.02.2024. & 1127/Ahd/2024 Assessment Year: Nil Page 2 of 4
Being aggrieved by the order dated 19.02.2024, the applicant filed present appeal before us.
The Ld. AR submitted that non conversant of the Income Tax matters as well as not operating the computers or log in to the Income Tax portal, the applicant could not follow the procedure under the impression that since there was not income tax litigation faced by the Trust in the past. Hence, there was delay of 38 days in filing the present appeal for which is may be condoned. The Ld. AR submitted that the applicant was not conversant of the Income Tax Portal, the applicant was not aware about the hearing notices issued by the CIT(Exemption) and could not represent their case properly. The Ld. AR submitted that the CIT(Exemption) passed ex-parte order therefor, the matter may be remanded back to the file of the CIT(Exemption) for proper adjudication of the application of the applicant trust after taking cognizance of the documents/details as required under the Income Tax Statute.
The Ld. DR relied upon the order dated 19.02.2024 passed by the CIT(Exemption).
We have heard both the parties and perused all the relevant material available on record. There is a delay of 38 days in filing the present appeal for which the applicant trust has filed the condonation of delay application. The reasons stated therein appears to be genuine, hence the delay is condoned. It is pertinent to note that the applicant was not aware about the log in to the Income Tax Portal and was under bona fide belief that the applicant trust filed all the required documents. Besides this the applicant’s CA has also not followed the procedure and being the lapse on the part of the professionals, the applicant cannot be penalised. The CIT(Exemption) passed ex-parte order without giving sufficient opportunity to the applicant to submit the details/documents. Therefore, it will be appropriate to remand back this matter to the file of the CIT(Exemption) for allowing the applicant to file the required details as per Income Tax Statute within the stipulated time given by the CIT(Exemption). The CIT(Exemption) after taking cognizance of the said details decide the applicant filed by the applicant as per the Income Tax Statute. Needless to say, the applicant be given opportunity of hearing by following principles of natural justice. It is pertinent to note that, the applicant will fully cooperate with the proceedings and will promptly participate as well as file details within stipulated time. If the applicant fails to do so, the CIT(Exemption) will note the same and decide & 1127/Ahd/2024 Assessment Year: Nil Page 3 of 4 the case accordingly as per law. Thus, is partly allowed for statistical purpose.
Now, coming to the appeal being which is filed by the applicant against the order dated 01.03.2024 passed by the CIT(Exemption) under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. There is a delay of 27 days in filing the appeal for which the applicant filed the detailed affidavit and from perusal of the same, the delay appears to be genuine, hence delay is condoned. As regards the facts, the applicant filed application for approval under Clause (iii) of first proviso to sub- section (5) of Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in Form No. 10AB electronically and notices were issued to the applicant. The applicant got provisional approval u/s 80G(5) pf the Act therefore, was required to file application in Form No. 10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G of the Act within the time period of at least six months prior to expiry of period of the provisional approval or within six months of commencements of its activities, whichever is earlier. In applicant’s case the date was on or before 30.09.2022. But the applicant failed to file the details, hence the CIT(Exemption) assumed the commencement date of incorporation/creation/registration i.e. 06.01.1983. Thus, the CIT(Exemption) rejected the application as not maintainable as the same was not filed within the stipulated time prescribed under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Ld. AR submitted that since the application for registration u/s 12A was rejected ex-parte as well as the present order in respect of application under Section 80G was also passed ex- parte, the matter may be remanded back as the CBDT in Section 80G application has extended the time as per Circular dated 25.04.2024 being Circular No. 7/2024.
Since the appeal wherein the application filed by the applicant u/s 12AB is remanded back to the file of the CIT(Exemption), the present issue under Section 80G application also needs verification as the order is passed ex-parte without giving sufficient time for applicant to file the details. Hence, it will be appropriate to remand back this matter to the file of the CIT(Exemption) for allowing the applicant to file the required details as per Income Tax Statute within the stipulated time given by the CIT(Exemption). The CIT(Exemption) after taking cognizance of the said details decide the applicant filed by the applicant as per the Income Tax Statute as well as the Circular No. 7 of 2024 dated 25.04.2024 issued by the CBDT. Needless to say, the applicant be given opportunity of hearing by following principles of natural justice. It is pertinent to note that, the applicant will fully cooperate with the & 1127/Ahd/2024 Assessment Year: Nil Page 4 of 4 proceedings and will promptly participate as well as file details within stipulated time. If the applicant fails to do so, the CIT(Exemption) will note the same and decide the case accordingly as per law. Thus, is partly allowed for statistical purpose.
In result, both the appeals of the applicant trust are partly allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 25th June, 2024.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026