DHADDA DIAMONDS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 5(1)(3), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee, having no further interest in pursuing the appeals due to no additions being made, requested to withdraw them. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the CIT's order invoking Section 263. During the set-aside proceedings, the Assessing Officer made no additions to the income.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeals against the CIT's Section 263 order should be dismissed as withdrawn when no additions were made in the subsequent proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
The above titled appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai (in short ‘CIT’) dt. 10.7.2014.
The assessee through the grounds of appeal has agitated the action of the Ld. CIT in setting aside the assessment order invoking the provisions of Sec. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee has moved an application dt. 21.3.2016 stating that in set aside proceedings, the Assessing Officer has not made any addition. In view
2 Dhadda Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. & 4906/Mum/2015 of this, the assessee is no more interested in further pursuing these appeals. It has, therefore, been prayed that the above appeals be dismissed as withdrawn. The ld. Departmental Representative has also stated that he has no objection in the withdrawal of the appeals by the assessee. In view of this, the above titled appeals are hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23/03/2016.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026