ANJUMAN E IMADI DAWOODI BOHRA JAMAAT TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(Exemption) and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The assessee was granted an opportunity to produce the necessary documents and information for examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) for non-compliance in submitting required documents and information. The assessee claimed miscommunication of notices led to the non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the registration application under Section 12AB was justified due to non-submission of documents, and if the assessee should be given another opportunity to comply.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.01.2023 of Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption),Bhopal passed u/s 12AB of the Act whereby the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AB was rejected due to noncompliance on the part of the assessee to produce requisite the documents and information. The assesse has raised following grounds of appeal:
1.The order appealed against is bad-in-law, void-ab-initio, barred by limitation, against the principles of natural justice and fair play, illegal and therefore liable to be quashed.
Anjuman E Imadi Dawoodi Bohra Page 2 of 4 2. Without prejudice, the Ld. CIT Exemption, Bhopal erred in rejecting the application filed for registration u/s 12AB without considering the documents on records and facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Without prejudice, the registration u/s 12AB ought to be granted in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. The appellant carves leave to add, amend or modify any of the grounds of appeal.”
The Ld. AR of the assessee has submitted that due to miscommunication/non-communication of the alleged notices issued by the CIT(E) the assesse could not respond to the same and therefore, the application of the assesse was rejected for want of relevant documents and information called for by the CIT(E). He has further submitted that though the assesse filed reply to one of the notices however, the same was not accepted by the CIT(E) on the ground of incomplete reply. Thus, Ld. AR has submitted that the assessee may be given one more opportunity to produce the relevant documents and information for examination of the CIT(E) for his satisfaction.
3. On the other hand, Ld. DR has not seriously opposed to the prayer of the assesse for remanding the matter to the record of the CIT(E) to be decided afresh.
Having Considered rival submission and careful perusal of the impugned order, at the outset we note that the application of the assesse for registration u/s 12AB was rejectd by the CIT(E) as per the reason given to the Annexure to para 9 of the impugned order as under:
“The assessee has applied in Form 10AB for registration u/s 12AB vide application under the new provision of Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, opportunity letters were issued to the assessee and various documents/details were called for, to process the said application and to verify the objects and activities of the assessee. The details of opportunity letters and response received in compliance thereof are as under; S.N. In respect of registration u/s 12AB
Date of Hearing fixed on Date of reply opportunity letter issued 1 02.11.2022 14.11.2022 No reply 2 28.11.2022 15.12.2022 No reply 3 27.11.2022 05.01.2023 Incomplete reply 4 16.01.2023 24.01.2023 No reply Vide above referred letters various documents/information were called for. In response to the above notices, the assessee has initially not submitted any documents. Thereafter, in response to the notice dated 27.12.2022, the assessee has submitted incomplete reply/documents.
2. Various details and documents were called vide notice dated 16.01.2023 but the assessee has not submitted the required documents.
In view of the above, it is clear that after giving several opportunities, the assessee has not submitted complete information/documents as called by this office vide various notices, which are necessary to verify the objects and activities of the assessee. In view of the above due to non-compliance of required documents/information, the application of the assessee in Form 10AB for grant of registration u/s 12AB of the Act is hereby rejected.”
5. Thus, the CIT(E) has referred to various notices including notice dated 16.01.2023 whereby various details and documents were called from the assessee but the assessee did not submit the required documents. The assessee has now filed the documents including financial statements, audited accounts, activity report and photographs supporting the activities & list of donation received etc. in the paper book which is Page 3 of 4 Anjuman E Imadi Dawoodi Bohra Page 4 of 4 required to be examined and verified by the competent authority. Accordingly in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice the matter is set aside to the record of the CIT(E) for fresh consideration of the application of the assesse for registration u/s 12AB after examination of the relevant record to be filed by the assesse. Needless to say before passing fresh order the assessee be given an appropriate opportunity of hearing.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13.10.2023
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026