SHRI SHAMLAJI AAROGYA SEVA TRUST,GODHRA vs. THE PR. CIT (CENTRAL), SURAT AT -VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Principal CIT rightly invoked Section 263 as the Assessing Officer failed to consider survey findings and potential misuse of trust funds by trustees. The diversion of funds and bogus salary debits necessitated further verification and potential taxability in the trust's hands.
What were the facts?
A trust filed its return declaring NIL income, claiming exemption under Sections 11 and 12. A survey revealed discrepancies, and trustees later disclosed significant personal income. The Principal CIT initiated revisionary proceedings under Section 263, holding the original assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the Principal CIT correctly invoked Section 263 to revise an assessment order where the AO allegedly ignored survey findings and potential misuse of trust funds by trustees.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 11,Section 12,Section 13(3),Section 69A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Anil Kumar Tantia v. ITO11 citing40 Taxmann.com 333 · 2013
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त ( अपील ) / The CIT(A)/ The Pr.CIT (Central), Surat at Vadodara 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध , आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण , राजोकट/DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad, 6. गाड� फाईल /Guard file.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026