BENNIE PHILLIPS,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 10(3)(4), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1750/MUM/2012Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 April 2016AY 2009-107 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including VDIS certificates and bank statements showing the maturity of RBI bonds purchased in the names of the minor children, to explain the source of the loans. Therefore, the additions made by the AO were deleted.

What were the facts?

The assessee received unsecured loans from their minor children. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions to income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing lack of creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.

What were the issues?

Whether loans received from minor children can be added as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 when their source is substantiated by prior disclosures and investment maturities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI R. C. SHARMA, AM & SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM

For Appellant: Shri Satish R. Mody, Shri Sanjeev Jain

Heard together (2 matters)

I.T.A. No. 1749/Mum/2012
I.T.A. No. 1750/Mum/2012

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयु�त / CIT - concerned 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, मुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard File आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, मुंबई / ITAT, Mumbai

Sr. No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictation sheets are attached Yes Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft dictated on 28.3.16 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft Placed before author 29.3.16 Sr.PS/PS 4 Draft proposed & placed before JM/AM the Second Member 5 Draft discussed/approved by JM/AM Second Member 6 Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS/PS 7 Order pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the AR 11 Date of Dispatch of order

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →