ACIT, CHENNAI vs. ISHTIAQ AHMED, CHENNAI

ITA 1680/CHNY/2013Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 January 2016AY 2011-1225 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that advances made by a company to a shareholder's proprietary concern for purchasing gold jewellery were business transactions and not loans or advances, thus Section 2(22)(e) was not applicable. Regarding commission paid, the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s restriction of disallowance to 20%. For exemption under Section 10, the Tribunal allowed conveyance and uniform allowance but disallowed travelling allowance.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders concerning additions made under Section 2(22)(e) and Section 40A(2)(b), and disallowance of exemption under Section 10. The primary dispute involved whether advances from a company to a shareholder's proprietary concern constituted deemed dividend or a business transaction.

What were the issues?

Whether advances from a company to a shareholder's proprietary concern are deemed dividends or business transactions, and the allowability of commission payments and certain exemptions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(22)(e),Section 40A(2)(b),Section 10,Section 234B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHENNAI "ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी ए. मोहन अलंकामणी, लेखा सद"य केसम"

BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1676, 1677, 1678 & 1679/Mds/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08, 2009 to 2011-12

The Assistant Commissioner of Shri Mustaq Ahmed, Income Tax, v. Central Circle IV(2), Kapaleeswar Nagar, Neelangarai, Chennai - 600 034. Chennai - 600 041. PAN : ADEPA 1181 B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1680/Mds/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12

The Assistant Commissioner of Shri Ishtiaq Ahmed, Income Tax, v. Central Circle IV(2), Kapaleeswar Nagar, Neelangarai, Chennai - 600 034. Chennai - 600 041. PAN : AAGPI 2739 C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant by : Shri A.B. Koli, JCIT ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondents by : Sh. N. Devanathan, Advocate

सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 27.11.2015 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 07.01.2016 आदेश /O R D

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 2(22)(e)

All 1,757 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(22)(e) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →