REKHA AJAYKUMAR AGRAWAL,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER O INCOME TAX, CIR.1(2), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no addition should be made based on deeming provisions when the assessee could not find tenants for vacant properties, even after engaging brokers. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was directed to be deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not offer rental income from two vacant residential properties. The Assessing Officer estimated the annual rental value based on an inspector's report and made an addition. The assessee argued that the properties were vacant and attempts to find tenants were unsuccessful.
What were the issues?
Whether rental income can be added when properties are vacant and attempts to find tenants have been unsuccessful.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM
PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2015- 16, is directed against the order passed by the Learned National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘NFAC’ for short”/Ld. CIT(A) dated 14.10.2022, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as the “Act”] dated 29.12.2017. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows:
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 23(4)
- Tushar Harishkumar Gangwani, Surat vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(4), SuratITA 188/SRT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Pradeep Ravichandra Kothari, AhmedabadITA 2328/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Apr 2026AY 2017-18
- Khinvasara Chavan, Pune vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2402/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
- Laljibhai Godadbhai Chaudhari, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-2(1)(2), AhmedabadITA 1720/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed13 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
- Mohit Vijaykumar Gupta, Mumbai vs The DCIT, Circle-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1091/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Nov 2025AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026