SIWANA AGRI MARKETING LIMITED (NOW MERGED WITH VITAL CONNECTIONS LLP),AHMEDABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the advances, and therefore, the presumption is that advances were made from these funds. The disallowance of interest expenses and the write-off of sundry balances were deemed unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee advanced interest-free loans while incurring interest expenses on borrowings. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest expenses, arguing a lack of business purpose and nexus with interest-free funds. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether interest expenses are disallowable when interest-free advances are made from sufficient interest-free funds, and whether a write-off of employee advances is allowable as a business expense.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing288 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.501 citing410 ITR 466 · 2019 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ D ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL & SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR
PER MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, AM:
This appeal by the assessee arises from the order dated 26-03-2024, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "CIT(A)"), under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The said order was passed in connection with the a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Fairchem Organics Ltd., Ahmedabad vs ACIT, Cir-15(1)(1), MumbaiMumbai20 Mar 2026Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds and internal accruals, exceeding the capital advances. It was presumed that advances were made from these interest-free funds, and the Revenue failed...
- Beacon Higher Education Services Pvt Ltd… vs DCIT Circle-4(2), New DelhiDelhi14 Jun 2024Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that a portion of the interest-free loans was made from the assessee's own sufficient funds. For the remaining advances to the subsidiary GLMPL, it was a strategic investment for commercial expediency, ...
- M/S Southern Petrochemical Industries… vs The ITO, Corportion Ward-3(1), ChennaiChennai10 Jan 2024Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the bad debt write-off was allowable as a business loss, considering it was an advance made for business purposes that became irrecoverable. The Tribunal also allowed the claim for proportionate in...
- Rajesh Agrawal, Raipur vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…Raipur19 Oct 2023Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the assessee's own funds and profits were sufficient to cover the gifts made to his nephews. Therefore, it was presumed that the gifts were made out of interest-free funds, and no part of the inter...
- Sh. Mahendra Singh, Flat No.303, Ashapura… vs ACIT, Circle-3, JodhpurJodhpur18 Sept 2023Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the interest-free advances given to the assessee's sons, who were partners in a firm with similar business, were for commercial expediency. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had su...
More judgments on Section 36(1)(iii)
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shah Brothers, West Singhbhum vs ACIT/DCIT, Cen Cir-1, RanchiITA 239/RAN/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026