PURPLE MEDICAL SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD [SUCCESSOR OF MIV THERAPEUTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD],MULUND vs. PR. CIT-1, SURAT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw its appeal from the Surat Bench. The assessee was granted liberty to file the appeal before the Mumbai Benches, with a sympathetic consideration for any delay.
What were the facts?
The assessee company was merged with another entity. The assessee sought to withdraw its appeal from the Surat Bench to refile it before the Mumbai Bench due to the merger and pending transfer application. The Department had no objection to this request.
What were the issues?
Whether the revision order under Section 263 was valid, and whether the assessee could withdraw its appeal to refile it in another jurisdiction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee by Shri Nimesh Chothani, CA Department by Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT-DR Date of hearing 02/05/2023 Date of pronouncement 02/05/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Principal Commissioner of Income tax-1, Surat [ in short the ld. Pr.CIT] dated 23/02/2020 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015- 16. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-
1. The ld. Pr.CIT has erred in passing the order u/s 263 of the Act ignoring the fact that the case of the appellant was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS and that the issue raised by your Honour in the order is not a part of the scope in limited scrutiny and hence the revision of such order is beyond the scope of section 263 of the Act.
Purple Medical Solutions P Ltd Vs Pr.CIT 2. The ld. Pr.CIT erred in passing the order u/s 263 of the Act on a non- existent entity and hence the order passed is void and bad in law and liable to be quashed.
The ld. Pr.CIT has erred in disallowing the amount received towards employee’s provident Fund and ESIC by invoking provision of Section 36 (1)(va) of the Act ignoring the fact that the total contribution is covered under the provisions of Section 43B of the Act and therefore allowable as deduction.”
At the outset of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee submits that pursuant to the order of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Ahmadabad Bench, dated 10/02/2020 and NCLT Mumbai Bench 08/05/2020, the assessee company has been merged with Purple Medical Solutions Private Limited. The office of successor company is situated a Mumbai. The assessee has already filed a Transfer Application for transferring of this appeal from Surat Bench to Mumbai Benches of the Tribunal. The ld. jurisdictional Pr.CIT has already granted no objection vide their reply/no objection dated 18/03/2023. The ld. AR submits that his application for transfer of appeal is pending consideration before the Hon’ble President, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. During hearing of the appeal, the ld. AR of the assessee submits that in order to avoid inordinate delay and technicalities in transferring of this appeal from Surat Bench to Mumbai Benches, he may be allowed to withdraw this appeal, with the liberty to file it before the Mumbai Benches of the Tribunal.
Purple Medical Solutions P Ltd Vs Pr.CIT 3. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax-Departmental Representative (ld. CIT-DR) for the revenue after going through his record, accepted the fact that the jurisdictional Pr. CIT has given no objection in transferring this appeal from Surat Bench to Mumbai Benches of the Tribunal. The ld. CIT-DR has further stated that he has no objection if such liberty is given to the assessee.
We have considered the submissions of both the parties and find that the ld. Pr.CIT passed the order on 23/03/2020 and the present appeal was filed on 20/07/2020. The Registry of this Bench has not issued defect memo, perhaps keeping in view the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition No. 3/2020, wherein the time limit for filing appeal during nationwide pandemic period of Covid-19, before the various Courts / authorities was extended up March 2022. Thus, keeping in view the prayer of ld. AR of the assessee, the assessee’s appeal is allowed to be withdrawn from the Surat Bench. The assessee is given liberty to file the same before the Mumbai Benches of Tribunal. In the event of filing appeal before Mumbai benches, the assessee shall be at liberty to file application for condonation of delay for explaining all the aforesaid fact in such application and the coordinate bench are expected to consider such application sympathetically for condoning the delay if any. With this observation, Purple Medical Solutions P Ltd Vs Pr.CIT the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file appeal at Mumbai Benches of the Tribunal.
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 02/05/2023 in open court at the time of hearing.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026