SHRI MUKESHKUMAR K. PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(2), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed a coordinate bench's decision which held that interest awarded under the Land Acquisition Act on enhanced compensation for agricultural land is not taxable as capital gains. Therefore, the addition made by the AO was not legally sustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee received interest income of Rs. 4,53,570/- in FY 2006-07, which was computed from FY 2001-02 to 2006-07. The assessee offered a portion of this interest income in his return, believing it was exempt from tax. The Assessing Officer taxed the entire amount on a receipt basis.
What were the issues?
Whether interest on enhanced compensation for agricultural land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act is taxable on receipt basis, and if the reopening of assessment was valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai v. ITO TDS128 citing388 ITR 343 · 2016 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD
PER SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-5, Ahmedabad, dated 30/12/2014 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08, on the following Grounds: i. The learned CIT(A) has erred both in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of AO in reopening the assessment u/s.1
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026