SETCO AUTOMOTIVE LTD.,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE JT.CIT, PANCHMAHAL RANGE, PANCHMAHAL
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(Appeals). The assessee's representative later filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw their appeal before the tribunal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ B ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD loZJh egkohj izlkn] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa vejthr flag] ys[kk lnL; ds le{kA loZJh egkohj izlkn] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa vejthr flag] ys[kk lnL; ds le{kA loZJh egkohj izlkn] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa vejthr flag] ys[kk loZJh egkohj izlkn] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa vejthr flag] ys[kk lnL; ds le{kA lnL; ds le{kA
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER : This is an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Vadodara, dated 09/04/2015 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11.
At the outset, Authorities Representative has filed an application for withdrawal of appeal by stating that the management is of the view that the appeal filed with the Hon’ble Bench is required to be withdrawn.
ITA No.2130/Ahd/2015 M/s. Setco Automotive Ltd. vs. JCIT Asst.Year –2010-11 - 2 - 3. In view of the above, we dismiss this appeal.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 16/11/2017
Sd/- Sd/- vejthr flag vejthr flag vejthr flag महावीर �साद vejthr flag (लेखा सद�य) (�या�यक सद�य) ( MAHAVIR PRASAD ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 16/11/2017 Priti Yadav, Sr. PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A)-2, Vadodara. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, True Copy उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad 1. Date of dictation 13/11/2017 (dictation-pad 1 pages attached at the end of this appeal-file) 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member 13/11/2017 3. Other Member… 4. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S…………….. 5. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement…… 6. Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S……. 7. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk………………… 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk…………………………………... 9. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order…………………….. 10. Date of Despatch of the Order………………
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026