SHRI RANI SATI SEWA SAMITI ,GONDIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS, PUNE , PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 824/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 February 2024AY 2023-24Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI AMARJIT SINGH (Accountant Member)3 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Pune benches of the ITAT do not have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain these appeals. According to the Standing Order, the Nagpur Bench has the exclusive jurisdiction for cases originating from Nagpur.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Rani Sati Sewa Samiti, Gondia, filed appeals against the CIT(Exemptions) Pune's orders refusing registration under Section 12AA and 80G. The assessee is assessed at Nagpur, and the impugned orders were passed by the CIT(Exemptions) in Pune.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the territorial jurisdiction of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to hear the appeals against the orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA,Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “B” BENCH : PUNE : [VIRTUAL HEARING]

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH,

Hearing: 06.02.2024Pronounced: 29.02.2024

BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.Nos.823 & 824/PUN./2023 [E-APPEAL] U/sec.12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Shri Rani Sati Sewa The Commissioner of Income Samiti, Gondia, Shakti Tax (Exemptions), Room Dham, Ganeshnagar, No.322, 3rd Floor, Income Tax vs. Gondia – 441 601 Office, PMT Bldgs., Shankar Maharashtra. Seth Road, Pune – 411 037 PAN AACTS3294G Maharashtra. (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : -None- For Revenue : Shri Ajay Kumar Kesari Date of Hearing : 06.02.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 29.02.2024 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. :

These assessee’s twin appeals I.T.A.No.823 & 824/ PUN./2023, arise against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Pune’s as many Din & notice nos. 1051621740(1), ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2022-23/1051627899(1) and dated 30.03.2023 and 29.03.2023, refusing sec.12AA and 80G registrations, respectively.

Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. We have heard the learned CIT- DR’s vehement submissions during the course of hearing.

2 I.T.A.No.823 & 824/PUN./2023 2. It emerges at the very outset that the assessee herein is based at Gondia, Maharashtra. And that it is assessed at Nagpur by the learned ITO, Ward-1 (Exemption), Nagpur as per the information gathered in the case files. This is indeed coupled with the fact that the assessee is aggrieved against the learned CIT(E) orders refusing sec.12AA and 80G registrations which have been passed at Pune. This being the clinching factual position, we are of the view that this tribunal’s Pune benches at Pune have no jurisdiction to entertain both these appeals going by the Standing Order no.1/1987 dated 17.07.1987 notifying the territorial jurisdiction of various benches in tribunal. As per the foregoing notification, the tribunal’s Nagpur Bench, Nagpur only is vested with the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the assessee’s instant appeals. We accordingly reject these assessee’s twin appeals “as returned” with liberty to be instituted afresh as per law in very terms.

All other pleadings on merits stand render academic.

These assessee’s twin appeals I.T.A.Nos.823 & 824/ 3. PUN./2023 are rejected “as returned” in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →