LOKMANGAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION,SOLAPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1227/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 March 2024Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication. The assessee was given three opportunities to present all relevant details and prove their case.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii) was denied by the CIT(Exemption) ex-parte due to non-compliance with a show cause notice. The assessee's counsel claimed a communication breakdown with their auditor prevented them from receiving the notice.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex-parte order of the CIT(Exemption) denying registration was justified, and if the assessee should be given an opportunity to present their case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI

Hearing: 08.03.2024Pronounced: 12.03.2024

BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.No.1227/PUN./2023 [E-APPEAL] U/sec.12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the I.T. Act, 1961 Lokmangal Development Foundation, 104 Rajiv The CIT (Exemption), Nagar, Akkalkote Road, 3rd Floor, Income Tax Office, vs. Solapur, Market Yard, PMT Bldg., Shankar Seth Road, Solapur – 413 005. Pune – 411 037. Maharashtra. Maharashtra. PAN AACAL7551L (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Pratik Sandbhor For Revenue : Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 08.03.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 12.03.2024 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. : This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14, arises against the CIT Exemption, Pune, Pune’s Din and Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-24/1056668618(1), dated 29.09.2023, involving proceedings u/s. 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

It emerges during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(E)’s order denying sec. 12AB(1)(b)(ii) registration to the assessee has been passed ex-parte after holding that the latter had failed to 2 ITA.No.1227/PUN./2023 file all the requisite details sought in the show cause notice having due date of compliance on 27.09.2023.

3.

Learned counsel’s only case during the course of hearing is that there was some communication between it’s auditor and the authorised representative before the CIT(E) due to which he could not get access of the corresponding notice(s) sent on the registered email. Mr. Sandbhor further sought to buttress the point that the assessee has never been a habitually non-cooperative in the lower appellate proceedings as he could not comply with the learned CIT(E)’s notice only on the last occasion. Faced with this situation, we deemed it appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the instant appeal back to the CIT(E) for his afresh adjudication, preferably within three effective opportunities of hearing, subject to the rider that it shall be the assessee’s onus and responsibility only to file and prove all the relevant details in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 12.03.2024.

Sd/- Sd/- [GD PADMAHSHALI] [SATBEER SINGH GODARA] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune, Dated 12th March, 2024 VBP/-

3 ITA.No.1227/PUN./2023 Copy to

More judgments on Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)

All 150 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →