ITO, WARD - 1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. BAJRANGBALI ENGINEERING CO. LTD., HOWRAH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1559/KOL/2010Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 June 2016AY 1982-832 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit of Rs. 10,00,000/- as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015. Following the CBDT's instructions, the appeal was treated as withdrawn/not pressed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(A). The tax effect involved in the appeal was below the revised monetary limit fixed by the CBDT for filing appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed due to the tax effect being below the revised monetary limit stipulated by the CBDT.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Date of concluding the hearing : June 16, 2016 Date of pronouncing the order : June 16, 2016

O R D E R Per Shri P.M. Jagtap :- This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata dated 17.05.2010. for the assessment year 1882-83.

2.

As pointed out by the ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, the tax effect involved in this appeal of the Revenue is less than the revised monetary limit recently fixed by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 at Rs.10,00,000/- for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal and this position clearly evident from the grounds raised by the Revenue in this appeal is not disputed even by the ld. D.R. In Circular No. 21/2015 (supra) recently issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit for filing the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal ./2010 Assessment year: 1882-1883 Page 2 of 2 has been increased to Rs.10,00,000/- and as clarified in the said Circular, the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs.10,00,000/- may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Keeping in view the instruction given by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, which is squarely applicable in the present case, the appeal filed by the Revenue in this case is treated as withdrawn/not pressed and dismissed accordingly.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →