GARDEN SILK MILLS PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1)(2), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved by the NCLT, all claims not included in the plan are extinguished and cannot be pursued. Therefore, the tax demands against the assessee for the relevant assessment years stood extinguished.
What were the facts?
The assessee company underwent insolvency proceedings, and its resolution plan was approved by the NCLT. The Income Tax Department was not recognized as an operational or secured creditor in this plan. The assessee argued that all tax liabilities were extinguished as they were not part of the approved resolution plan.
What were the issues?
Whether tax liabilities are extinguished if not included in an NCLT-approved resolution plan, and if the Income Tax Department can pursue such claims.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction192 citing126 Taxmann.com 132 · 2021 · SC
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Dr. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 372 to 382/Srt /2022 (Assessment Year: 2010-11 to 2017-18, 2019-20 & 2020-21) (Physical hearing) Garden Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., D.C.I.T., 1st Floor, Tulsi Krupa Arcade, Circle-1(1)(2), Vs. Aai Mata Chowk, Surat. Parvat Patia Road, Surat, Gujarat-395010 PAN No. AAACG 8932 C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue
Assessee represented by Shri Nitin Gheewala, CA with Nancy Vankawala Revenue represented by Shri Ashish Pophare, CIT-DR with Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 21/09/2023 Date of pronouncement 22/09/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: BENCH:
This bunch of eleven (11) appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (in Short NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (in short, the ld. CIT(A) all dated 14/10/2022 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11 to 2017-18, 2019-20 and 2020-21. In all these appeals, the assessee has raised similar grounds of appeal. Facts in all these years are identical, therefore, with the consent of parties all
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 156A
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6490/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6489/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital, MumbaiITA 6355/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6283/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6067/MUM/2026[2016]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026