SUMIN CHARITABLE TRUST,SATARA vs. CIT EXMPTION PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 804/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 August 2024AY 2022-2023Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Judicial Member), MS. ASTHA CHANDRA (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemption) denied registration without considering the appellant's submissions. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh disposal.

What were the facts?

The appellant trust, which had provisional registration, applied for regular registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(Exemption) denied the registration without considering the detailed replies filed by the trust.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) properly considered the assessee's submissions before denying registration. Whether the denial of registration was justified without affording a proper opportunity of hearing.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 12A(1)(ac)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH ‘B’, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Kumar Kshirsagar
Hearing: 22.07.2024Pronounced: 07.08.2024

आदेश / ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the appellant trust directed against the order of the CIT Exemption, Pune dt. 31.03.2023 denying grant of registration u/s.12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’).

2.

Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a Trust, got provisional registration on 27.05.2021. The appellant trust filed application in Form No.10AB on 26.09.2022 seeking regular registration under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act. On receipt of the said application, the ld. CIT (Exemptions), in order to verify the genuineness of activities of the appellant trust and compliance to requirements of any other law, issued notice through ITBA portal on 15.12.2022 calling for certain information/clarification. The appellant trust had filed the requisite information in response to the questionnaires dated 15.12.2022, 12.03.2023 on 24.12.2022 and 18.03.2023. However, the ld. CIT(Exemptions) without taking into consideration the detailed replies filed by the appellant trust had denied the grant of regular registration, cancelling the provisional registration.

3.

Being aggrieved, the appellant trust is in appeal before us in the present appeal.

4.

We heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. The ld.CIT(Exemptions) without taking into consideration the written submissions filed before him had proceeded to deny the grant of regular registration, cancelling the provisional registration. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we remit the matter to the file of CIT(Exemptions) for denovo disposal of the application in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the appellant trust. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the appellant trust stands partly allowed.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the appellant trust is partly allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 07th August, 2024.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →