INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1,AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR vs. NARENDRA SAMPATLAL BAFNA, AHMEDNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that additions cannot be made merely on the basis of a statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act without corroborative evidence. The presumption under section 132(4A) is applicable only to the searched person and not to third parties.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment based on information that the assessee took a cash loan of Rs. 6,20,00,000/- through a finance broker, which was not reflected in the return of income. The addition was made based on the statement of the finance broker recorded under section 132(4).
What were the issues?
Whether an addition can be made based solely on the statement of a third party recorded under section 132(4) without corroborative evidence? Whether the presumption under section 132(4A) can be extended to third parties?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(15)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sumati Dayal v. CIT1,967 citing214 ITR 801 · 1995 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Durga Prasad More1,579 citing72 ITR 807 · 1971 · SC
- Chuharmal v. CIT340 citing172 ITR 250 · 1988 · SC
- CIT v. R. Nalini Devi ITTA 232 of 2013 (A. P)299 citing294 ITR 49 · 2007 · SC
- Addl. CIT v. Miss Lata Mangeshkar145 citing97 ITR 696 · 1974 · HC
- CIT v. M.Ganapathi Mudaliar110 citing53 ITR 623 · 1964 · SC
- CIT v. P.V. Kalyanasundaram108 citing155 Taxmann 454 · 2006 · HC
- Startex (India) (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT88 citing84 ITD 320 · 2003 · ITAT
- CIT v. P.V Kalyana78 citing164 Taxmann 78 · 2007 · SC
- Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi v. CIT71 citing102 ITD 375 · 2006 · ITAT
- CIT v. Lachhman Das Oswal30 citing126 ITR 446 · 1980 · HC
- 01. Sunsathi Dayal v. CIT (SC)19 citing213 ITR 805 · 1995 · HC
- Khopade Kisanrao Manikrao v. ACIT13 citing74 ITD 25 · 2000 · ITAT
- Dhunjibhoy Stud & Agricultural Farm v. DCIT7 citing82 ITD 18 · 2002 · ITAT
- 8). (v) P.R.Patel v. Dy.CIT5 citing78 ITD 51 · 2001 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy //
Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 12/13.08.2024 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 13.08.2024 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before the 3 JM/AM Second Member Draft discussed/approved by 4 AM/AM Second Member Approved Draft comes to the Sr. 5 Sr. PS/PS PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to the 9 Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 132(4)
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Anilkumar Jayantilal Khatri, Ahmedabad vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2053/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026