TOOBA EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE TRUST,BHIWANDI vs. CIT EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1017/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 September 2024AY 2023-24Bench: SHRI R.K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI S.S. GODARA (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the assessee's registration application back to the CIT(Exemption) for a fresh examination. This was done considering the possibility of communication gaps and insufficient time for compliance.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) for failing to respond to show cause notices. The CIT(E) had not granted sufficient time for compliance before issuing the impugned order.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) granted adequate time for the assessee to respond to notices before rejecting the registration application under Section 12AB.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI S.S. GODARA

For Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Hearing: 10.09.2024Pronounced: 12.09.2024

आदेश / ORDER आदेश आदेश आदेश

PER S.S. GODARA, JM :

1.

This assesseee’s appeal arises against the ld. CIT(Exemption), Pune’s Din & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-24/ 10626437771(1), dated 14.03.2024 rejecting the application of the assessee u/s.12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

2.

It emerges with the able assistance coming from the Revenue side that the learned CIT(E)’s impugned order herein has refused sec.12A registration to the assessee on account of the fact that the latter had failed to respond to the corresponding show cause notice(s) on various occasions.

3.

Learned CIT-DR could not dispute the clinching fact that the CIT(E) had not even granted two weeks effective time from the date of his last hearing notice dated 14.02.2024 for compliance on or before 20.02.2024 which followed the impugned order dated 14.03.2024. And also that communication gap at various levels in such a short span of time could also not be altogether ruled-out. We accordingly deem it proper to restore the assessee’s instant sec.12A registration application back to the CIT(E) for his afresh appropriate examination as per law, preferably within three effective opportunities of hearing, subject to a rider that it shall be the assessee’s risk and responsibility only to plead and prove in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.

Order pronounced in the open court on 12th September, 2024.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →