ITO, WARD-1(1), SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR vs. MS. KSHIRSAGAR FABRICS, SOLAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding no infirmity in quashing the reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal agreed that reassessment initiated solely on an audit objection without any failure by the assessee to disclose material facts is not valid.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment based on an audit objection regarding cash payments made by the assessee. The original assessment was completed under Section 143(3), and the AO had previously disagreed with the audit party's findings. The CIT(A) quashed the reassessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings initiated based on an audit objection, after the AO had initially disagreed with it and without any failure to disclose material facts by the assessee, are valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Usha International Ltd.231 citing348 ITR 485 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. PVS Beedies Pvt. Ltd.120 citing237 ITR 13 · 1999 · SC
- ACIT v. ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd.76 citing24 Taxmann.com 310 · 2012 · SC
- New Light Trading Co. v. CIT24 citing256 ITR 391 · 2002 · HC
- 1 Yuvraj v. Union of India Bombay High Court19 citing225 CTR 283 · 2009 · HC
- Ltd. vs DCIT 301 ITR 407 (Bom.), ICICI Home Finance Co. Ltd. v. ACIT15 citing298 ITR 32 · 2008 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; 1. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. The concerned Pr.CIT 4. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy //
Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 11.09.2024 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 13.09.2024 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before the 3 JM/AM Second Member Draft discussed/approved by Second 4 AM/AM Member 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to the Head 9 Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 40A(3)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Saiyed Zaharul Alam, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2233/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- M/S Sadana Electric Store, Lucknow vs DCIT Range-6, LucknowITA 283/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Nagendra Prasad, Patna vs ITO Ward -5(3) Patna, Dak BanglowITA 362/PAT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026