CENTRAL ELECTRONICS LTD.,UTTAR PRADESH vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeals. The department had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s order. The assessee informed the tribunal that the CIT(A) had accepted their miscellaneous application and deleted the additions made by the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed by the revenue are to be dismissed as withdrawn based on the subsequent order of the CIT(A) and the assessee's request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI A.T. VARKEY & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘B’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & 662/Del./2014 (ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2007-08 & 2008-09) M/s. Central Electronics Ltd., vs. DCIT, Circle 3 (1), 4, Industrial Area, Sahibabad, New Delhi. Sahibabad – 201 010 (U.P.) (PAN : AAACC1261G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Jitendra Nath, CA and Shri K.K. Aggarwal, AR REVENUE BY : Ms. Susan George, Senior DR O R D E R PER A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
These appeals, at the instance of the revenue, are filed against the order of the CIT (Appeals)-VIII, New Delhi dated 27.11.2013 for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09.
At the outset of the hearing, the ld. AR for the assessee filed a letter dated 11th January, 2016 of the assessee and submitted that the ld. CIT (A), New Delhi has been pleased to accept the assessee’s miscellaneous application u/s 154 of the Act and has deleted the additions made by the ld. AO; and the ld. AO did not file appeal against the order of ld. CIT (A), New Delhi passed u/s 154/250 of the Act dated 14.02.2014. Therefore, ld. AR for the assessee requested that they may be allowed to withdraw the appeals. The department has no objection.
Having considered the submissions of the ld. AR for the assessee, we allow the assessee to withdraw the appeals. The appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in open court on this 11th day of January, 2016 after the conclusion of the hearing.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026