SANT PRASAD (HUF),SILIGURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-2(3), SILIGURI, SILIGURI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal. The revenue did not object to this request. Therefore, the tribunal decided to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2005-06. At the time of hearing, the assessee submitted an application to withdraw the appeal due to old age and ill health.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal should be granted.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’BENCH,KOLKATA
Before: Shri M.Balaganesh, & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Siliguri dated 12-09-2013 for the assessment year 2005-06.
It is noticed that at the time of hearing none was present on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated 03-08-2016, the assessee himself submitted as under:-
Date: 03.08.2016 To The Assistant Register Income Tax Appellate Tribunal C Bench, 225/C AJC Bose Road, Kolkata Sub: Appeal no. 2568/Kol-2013 Assessment year 2005-06 hearing fixed on 23.08.2016 Sir, Kindly refer to your letter dated 09.06.2016. Because of my old age and ill health I am unable to go to Kolkata. I hereby withdraw my said appeal numbered as 2568/Kol-2013 dated 11.11.2013 for the assessment year 2005-2006 hearing fixed on 23.08.2016 before bench C With regards, Yours faithfully, Sd/- Sant Prasad (HUF) Ganesh Ram Compound, H.C Road Siliguri,Pin-734001, W.B.”
Ld.DR appearing on behalf of the revenue has not objected to the above proposition of the assessee.
In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed. 5.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026