ACIT CENT. CIR. - 47, MUMBAI vs. SRI. BHARAT K. SHETH, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals were not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which mandates withdrawal or non-pressing of appeals with a tax effect below a specified limit. The appeals were dismissed as not pressed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed two appeals before the ITAT. The tax effect in both appeals was less than Rs. 10 lacs.
What were the issues?
Applicability of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 to pending appeals and whether appeals with a tax effect below the specified monetary limit are maintainable.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Revenue by Sh B.S.Bist,Sr DR Assessee by : Shri Jamshedji सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date of Hearing : 18-05-2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement : 18-05-2016 आदेश / O R D E R PER RAMIT KOCHAR,ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
These two appeal filed by the Revenue are disposed of because the tax effect in the appeal is less than Rs. 10 lacs as per the latest CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, F. No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt) dated 10th December, 2015 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
The ld. Senior D.R. submitted that tax effect involved in these two appeal is less than Rs. 10 lacs and the CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 is applicable to this appeal and the both the appeals not maintainable/not pressed in terms of CBDT circular no 21/2015 dated 10/12/2015. The ld. Senior DR submitted that as per the latest CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, F. No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt) dated 10th December, 2015 issued by Central ITA 1236/Mum/2006 & 2 ITA2606/Mum/2006 Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, no appeal shall be filed by the Revenue in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3 of the circular Para 3 of the Circular No. 21/2015 S No. Appeals in Income tax Monetary Limit matters (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- In the said circular vide para 10, it is stipulated that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in may be withdrawn/not pressed.
Keeping in view the CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 which is applicable from retrospective effect and is also applicable to pending appeals and also in view of ld. Senior DR stating before us that these two appeals are now not maintainable/not pressed in view of the above CBDT Circular, we hold that these two appeals filed by the Revenue which are covered by this order involving tax effect of less than Rs. 10 lacs are not maintainable and are dismissed being not pressed. However, the Revenue is at liberty to file an application for recall of these appeal in accordance with law, if at any stage the Revenue wants to agitate the matter in accordance with the provisions/clauses as contained in the afore-stated circular. We order accordingly.
ITA 1236/Mum/2006 & 3 ITA2606/Mum/2006
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026