SALILKUMAR MADHUKARRAO MAJGAONKAR,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3), NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 127/NAG/2023Status: HeardITAT Nagpur01 May 2024AY 2016-17Bench: SHRI R.K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI V. DURGA RAO (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s order was ex-parte and, following principles of natural justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) resulted in an ex-parte order. The assessee requested another opportunity to present their case, while the revenue argued that sufficient opportunities were already provided.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. The primary issue is the violation of natural justice.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI V. DURGA RAO

For Appellant: Smt. Veena Agrawal
For Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 17/03/2023, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (“the learned CIT(A)”), for the assessment year 2016-17.

2.

When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) passed an ex-parte

Salil Kumar Madhukarrao Majgaonkar ITA no.127/Nag./2023 order and prayed that one more opportunity may be given to the assessee to substantiate its case before the learned CIT(A).

3.

On the other hand, the learned D.R. submitted that the learned CIT(A) has given sufficient opportunities inspite of that the assesse has not appeared before the learned CIT(A) and not filed relevant details. He strongly supported the orders passed by the learned CIT(A).

4.

We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through orders of the authorities below. We find that though the learned CIT(A) gave opportunities to the assessee, ultimately, the order passed by him is an ex-parte order. Therefore, we are of the opinion that by following the principles of natural justice, one more opportunity should be given to the assesse to substantiate his case before the learned CIT(A). In view of the above, the order passed by the learned CIT(A) is set aside and remit the matter to the file of the learned CIT(A) and direct him to adjudicate the matter afresh after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. It is also directed that the assessee should not seek adjournment without there being a justified reason. Accordingly, all the grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are allowed for statistical purposes.

Salil Kumar Madhukarrao Majgaonkar ITA no.127/Nag./2023

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 01/05/2024.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →