ITO 27(1)(1), NAVI MUMBAI vs. ANITA AGARWAL, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7416/MUM/2014Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 June 2016AY 2011-122 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. This was primarily due to the low tax effect involved, which was below Rs. 10 lakhs, making the appeal not maintainable as per the relevant circular.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed exemption for capital gains under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this exemption and made an addition of Rs. 41,51,937/- to the capital gains. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the eligibility of the assessee for exemption of capital gains under Section 54. The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds related to tax effect.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 54

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,

Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO

For Appellant: Shri Aarsi Prasad, DR

O R D E R

More judgments on Section 54

All 1,745 judgments and leading authorities on Section 54 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →