JAGANNATH CHANDU SHETTY,KALYAN vs. ITO WD 3(2), KALYAN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the additional ground as it was a legal issue. Since the fact of whether a notice under Section 143(2) was issued was not clear from the lower authorities' orders, the appeals were restored to the AO for verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2005-06 and 2006-07. The assessee raised an additional ground that the assessment was invalid due to the non-issuance of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment is invalid due to the non-issuance of a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act before completing the assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J”, BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JM
O R D E R
PER R.C.SHARMA (A.M): These are the appeals filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Mumbai, for the assessment years 2005-06 & 2006-07, in the matter of order passed u/s.143(3)/147 of the I.T.Act. 2. During the course of hearing ld. AR has raised additional ground, which reads as under :- “Under the facts and circumstances of case and in law, the AO has erred in not issuing the notice u/s.143(2) of the Act and completing the assessment proceeding and thus the order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act, being bad in law should be annulled.” The above additional ground so raised is absolutely a legal ground which goes to the root of the issue. In view of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd., 229 ITR 383(SC), we accept the additional ground for adjudication which is absolutely a legal ground. 3. It was contended by ld. AR that no notice u/s.143(2) was issued by the AO before completion of assessment, which renders the entire assessment as invalid. Our attention was invited to the order of AO & CIT(A), wherein nowhere issue of notice u/s.143(2) was mentioned. It was contended by ld. DR that fact of issue of notice u/s.143(2) can be verified only from the case records of the AO. He further contended that merely not mentioning the issue of notice u/s.143(2) in the assessment order cannot lead to the conclusion that no notice has been issued. 4. We have considered rival contentions and found that additional ground so raised is absolutely legal in nature, therefore, we accept the same for adjudication. Since facts with regard to issue of notice u/s.143(2) is not clear from the order of AO or CIT(A), therefore, in all fairness, we restore both these appeals back to the file of AO to verify the fact of issue of notice u/s.143(2) before completion of assessment. If the AO finds that notice u/s.143(2) was not issue, we direct the AO to cancel the assessment so framed. 5. In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed in part for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 23/06/ 2016. (RAM LAL NEGI) (R.C.SHARMA) न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026