SANTOSH STARCH LTD., ( NOW KNOWN AS SANSTAR BIOPOLYMERS LTD.),AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-4, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had requested to withdraw the appeal and the Departmental Representative had no objection. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal challenging an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263. The assessee subsequently filed a request to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn as per their request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD ‘B’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
By way of this appeal the assessee appellant has challenged correctness of the
order dated 16.03.2015 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4,
Ahmedabad under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
At the outset, it is noticed that the assessee has submitted a request vide letter
dated 11.10.2017 seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal.
The learned. Departmental Representative has no objection for withdrawal of the
assessee’s appeal.
ITA No.1092/Ahd/2015 Santosh Starch Ltd vs. Pr. CIT A.Y. 2010-11 Page 2 of 3 4. Therefore, in view of these facts, we allow the withdrawal of the appeal filed by
the assessee and accordingly appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 17th day of October, 2017.
Sd/- Sd/-
Mahavir Prasad Pramod Kumar (Judicial Member) (Accountant Member) Ahmedabad, the 17th day of October, 2017 **bt* Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) Commissioner (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order TRUE COPY Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad benches, Ahmedabad
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026