SOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT IN EDUCATION,MUSSOORIE vs. ITO EXEMPTION WORD DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the sanction for reopening the assessment was granted in a mechanical manner, evidenced by rubber-stamped approvals without independent application of mind. Consequently, the notices issued under Section 148 and the consequent reassessment orders were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were filed against assessment orders passed under Section 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act. The primary contention was that the notice issued under Section 148 was based on a mechanical sanction under Section 151, rendering the assessment invalid.
What were the issues?
Whether the sanction for issuing notice under Section 148 was validly granted, considering the manner in which it was recorded by the competent authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. S. Goyanka Lime & Chemical Ltd.340 citing64 Taxmann.com 313 · 2015 · SC
- PCIT v. NC Cables Ltd.104 citing391 ITR 11 · 2017 · HC
- Arjun Singh v. ADIT102 citing246 ITR 363 · 2000 · HC
- Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT98 citing475 ITR 360 · 2018 · HC
- Union of India v. M.L. Capoor42 citing2 SCC 836 · 1973
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH, DEHRADUN
Before: YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The captioned Appeals are filed by the Assessee against the orders
of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal
Centre (‘Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC’ for short), New Delhi dated 09/09/2025 for the Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2010-11 and the order dated
04/09/2025 for A.Y 2011-12 respectively.
Brief facts of the case are that, assessment orders came to be passed on 26/12/2016 for A.Y 2009-10 to 2011-12 under Section 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) against the Assessee by making certain additions
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026