SHREE MAHAVIR CARBON (P) LTD,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CUTTACK
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the assessee's conduct indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in limine.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against the CIT(A) order was scheduled for hearing. The notice sent to the assessee was returned unserved with the remark 'Left always locked', and no change of address was provided.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee's non-appearance and lack of prosecution.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI N.S SAINI & PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
BEFORE S/SHRI N.S SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No. 25/CTK/2016 Assessment Year :2004-05 Shri Mahavir Carbon Pvt. Vs. ACIT, Circle 1(1), Cuttack Ltd.,Plot No.85, Phase-III, New Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack PAN/GIR No. AAECS 6717 J (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)
Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri B.N.Das, DR
Date of Hearing : 29/05/ 2017 Date of Pronouncement : 31 /05/ 2017
O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, JM This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-
Cuttack, dated 31.10.2013, for the assessment year 2004-05.
The notice of hearing was sent to the assessee fixing the date of
hearing on 31.5.2017 and was returned back unserved with the postal
remarks “Left always locked”. Further, the assessee has not furnished
the change of address to the Tribunal. From the above conduct of the
assessee, it appears that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the
appeal before the Tribunal. In these circumstances, as held by ITAT Delhi
Bench in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 that
there may be various reasons for the assessee to remain absent at the
time of hearing and one of the reasons might be absence to prosecute the
appeal and we hereby dismiss the appeal in limine. However, we make it
clear that the assessee is at liberty to file a petition to recall this order
provided convincing/sufficient cause be explained for non-appearance on
the said date of hearing.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed Order pronounced on 31 /05/2017. Sd/- sd/- (N.S Saini) (Pavan Kumar Gadale) ACCONTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 31/05/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Shri Mahavir Carbon Pvt. Ltd.,Plot No.85, Phase-III, New Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack 2. The Respondent. ACIT, Circle 1(1), Cuttack 3. The CIT(A) Cuttack 4. Pr.CIT, Cuttack 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy//
SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026