SH. VIPIN GUPTA,SOLAN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, PARWANOO
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the benefit of Section 80IC is triggered in the year of completion of substantial expansion, and this year is the initial assessment year, irrespective of any deduction claimed under Section 80IB.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IC of the Income-tax Act for substantial expansion. The issue was whether the period for which deduction was claimed under Section 80IB should be included for calculating the period of deduction under Section 80IC.
What were the issues?
The key issue was the calculation of the initial assessment year for claiming deduction under Section 80IC in cases where Section 80IB deduction was also claimed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 28.02.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (A), Shimla [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].
The short issue involved in this appeal is as to whether the period for which the assessee has claimed deduction u/s 80 IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') is to be included for the purpose of period of deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 80IC of the Income-tax Act on account of substantial expansion.
ITA No. 684//Chd/2018- ShVipin Gupta, Distt. Solan 2
At the outset, both the Ld. Representatives of the parties have submitted that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘Mahabir Industries Vs. PCIT’ in Civil Appeal No (s) 4765-4766 of 2018 vide order dated 18.5.2018, wherein, the Hon'ble supreme Court has held that benefit of provisions of section 80IC of the Act shall get triggered in the year in which such substantial expansion is completed and that year is to be treated as initial assessment year, irrespective of any deduction, claimed by the assessee u/s 80IB of the Act.
In view of this, the issue involved in this appeal is covered in favour of the assessee. The Assessing officer is, therefore, directed to grant deduction to the assessee u/s 80IC of the Act as per the principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘Mahabir Industries Vs. PCIT’ (supra). The appeal of the assessee stands allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 05.10.2018
Sd/- Sd/- अ�नपूणा� गु�ता संजय गग� (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) (SANJAY GARG ) लेखा सद�य/ Accountant Member �या�यक सद�य/ Judicial Member Dated : 5.10.2018 Rkk
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File
ITA No. 684//Chd/2018- ShVipin Gupta, Distt. Solan 3
आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
More judgments on Section 80IB
- D.C.I.T., Circle - 10(1), Kolkata vs M/S. Berger Paints India Ltd., KolkataITA 740/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Tasa Foods Private Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, Circle-7(1)(1), BengaluruITA 2908/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Uflex Limited, Delhi vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 280/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida vs Uflex Limited, DelhiITTPA 272/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Uflex Limited, Pamposh Enclave, Greater… vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 260/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026