M/S JANANI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The court made it clear that no opinion was expressed on the contentions raised, and all contentions of the parties were left open.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, M/s Janani Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. After arguing the matter for some time, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the challenge to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. However, the case was disposed of on withdrawal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 8881/2015 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
M/S JANANI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., NO.24, IST MAIN ROAD, NEAR BHASHYAM CIRCLE PETROL PUMP, VYALIKAVAL BENGALURU-560 003. PAN: AABCJ7371H REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. N.V.S.MURTHY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
... PETITIONER
(BY Dr. C.P. RAMASWAMI FOR SRI BALRAM R. RAO ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), 3RD FLOOR
CENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,
QUEEN’S ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX
CENTRAL RANGE-1, 3RD FLOOR
CENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,
QUEEN’S ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), 3RD FLOOR
CENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,
QUEEN’S ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001. ..RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH AS FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ORTHERWISE, THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 DATED 28.03.2014 VIDE ANN-A ORDER PASSED IN DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1).
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Dr.C.P.Ramaswami, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and to pursue his grievance before jurisdictional Assessing Officer. A memo is filed to the said effect. Said memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
It is made clear that no opinion is expressed on the contentions raised. All contentions of the parties are left open.
Registry is directed to return Annexures-A & B on same being substituted with duly attested photocopies.
Sd/- JUDGE
*sp
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026